"COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF HYDROLOGICAL MODELS IN RUVUBU RIVER BASIN"

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Astere NINDAMUTSA
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-27T06:49:18Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-27T06:49:18Z
dc.date.issued 2007-07
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/628
dc.description.abstract Rainfall-run off models have become accepted as important tools in operational hydrology for estimating information required for water resources planning, design, and operation. Specifically, rainfall-runoff models are normally useful tools where data are insufficient by simulating and by extending the time series. This thesis work presents an appraisal study to compare the performance of four hydrological models in RVZ- Nyabiraba catchment for Ruvubu river basin and to select the best candidate model for the catchment response prediction. In this appr a isal study, to achieve our objective 2 empirical models: Simple Linear · Model (SLM), Linear Perturbation Model (LPM), and 2 conceptual models: (HBV) and Soil Moistur e Accounting and Routing (SMAR) were tested in Ruvyironza-Nyabiraba catchment. Parameter optimization is carried out by trial and error, ordinary least squares, Rosenbrok. Simplex and generic algorithm. The parameter set that gave the best objective function -value over the calibration period in the ranges of the parameters was used for validation; The visual comparisons were also made for the low and high flow fit of the hydrographs. The comparison was also made on the basis of the relative errorof ! peak (R E) criteria and the i?dex of volumetric fit (IVF). From the models comparison performance criteria, it is shown that the Simple line ar model ( SL M) and HBV are not adequate in modelli ng t�e rainfall runoff transformation. However , th e RVZ- Nyabiraba catchments exhibit marked seasonal behaviour and good resul t s was also obtained with Linear Perturbation model (LPM) which involves the ass u mption o f linearity between the departures from seasonal expectations in input and out put seri es . Within the range (0.5 - 0 . 9) of the tested models performance, in the RVZ­ Nyabiraba c atc hment , out of the four models, SMAR was found to be the best candidate model th at can sim u late the flows. Hence, SMAR is adequate in modelling the rainfall runoff tran sformation. Further investigation should be made to generalize the app lic a bili t y of this model to all Ruvubu river basins. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ARBA MINCH UNIVERSIT en_US
dc.title "COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF HYDROLOGICAL MODELS IN RUVUBU RIVER BASIN" en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AMU IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account