ASSESSING THE REALIZATION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHT IN TRADITIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: OF THE GAMO PEOPLE CASE STUDY IN BOREDAWOREDA.

Abstract

Conflict involves the struggle and disagreements between parties’. In this context, conflict resolution and dispute resolution are terms often used interchangeably. Historically, the concept of dispute originated from a crash among individuals. Ethiopia has a rich tradition of practicing various methods for resolving disputes. These methods have been referred to by different names in scholar work, such as unofficial law, traditional justice system, famous non-state law, customary dispute resolution mechanism, restorative justice, alternative dispute resolution, and popular dispute resolution mechanism. Study aims to explore, analyze, and reintroduce the values of the traditional dispute resolution method known as saro medho in the context of protecting human rights. Traditional dispute resolution existed trend of human rights, it had showed two main characteristics. However, they also had their strengths and weaknesses. Elements such as urban or rural setting, gender, social status, marital status, age, and education played a role in these traditional systems, shaping their values and outcomes in terms of human rights protection. Additionally, traditional dispute resolution mechanisms in study areas were such that social gatherings and ceremonies brought peace, such as Masqala, Shashiga, and Gimo, community elders, and sub-local area leaders. Factors and causes encompassed issues of marginalization&discrimination, elders involvement, fairness, governance, external authorities interferences, state intervention, urbanization, resource scarcity, financial support, institutional influences. The research utilized descriptive methods, including key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis, to achieve its objectives. The primary causes that led to the utilization of traditional dispute resolution mechanisms for human rights promotion were often rooted in the absence of clearly support. In cases where support did exist, it was often deemed ineffective or lacking authenticity. Even if it has support, it's because it's fake.