Abstract:
Background: Compassionate and respectful maternity care is a crucial component of the health
care service in the continuum of care which ranges from pre-pregnancy to pregnancy, intra partum, and the postnatal period with an enabling environment and a well-functioning health
system. However, the provision of compassionate and respectful maternity care continues to be
low, and contributing factors were also diverse in features.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of compassionate and respectful maternity care during
facility -based childbirth in Geressie district.
Method: Facility- based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 01-July 30, 2023. A
total of 419 mothers who had delivered in public health facilities were participated. Systematic
sampling method was used to select the study participats. Data were collected using a pretested
structured and interviewer administered questionnaire. Data were entered into Epi info version
7.1 and exported to SPSS version 26.0 for cleaning and analysis. Both bivariable and
multivariable logistic regression analysis was undertaken and statistical significance was
declared at a P-value of < 0.05.
Rseult: In this study, compassionate and respectful maternity care was 27.9% (95% CI (23.7,
32.5)) and 29.1% (95% CI (24.8, 33.7)) of mothers who gave birth in the public health facilities
in the study area, respectively. Maternal age of 25-29 (AOR=3.86, 95% CI (1.82, 8.16)) and 30-
34 years (AOR=4.57, 95% CI (1.75, 11.89)), currently employed (AOR=5.28, 95% CI (2.62,
10.67)), wealth index of 2
nd (AOR=3.70, 95% CI (1.34, 10.21)), 3
rd (AOR=3.64, 95% CI (1.31,
10.10)) and 4th quintile (AOR=9.54, 95% CI (3.217, 28.31)), grand multiparous (AOR=3.89,
95% CI (1.02, 14.80)), planned pregnancy (AOR=10.44, 95% CI (3.14, 34.70), number of
providers during delivery(≤2) (AOR=2.80, 95% CI (1.52, 5.18)), type of health facility(public
hospital) (AOR=2.01, 95% CI (1.02, 3.94)), and institutional level RMC index available
(AOR=5.19, 95% CI (2.22, 12.10)) were found to be detrimental factors for receiving
compassionate maternity care. Furthermore, likelihood of reciving respectful maternity care was
found to be higher among currently employed (AOR=4.69, 95% CI (2.34, 9.42)), wealth status
2
nd (AOR=4.64, 95% CI (1.74, 12.38)), 3rd (AOR=5.09, 95% CI (1.76, 14.76)), and 4th quintile
(AOR=11.88, 95% CI (3.92, 35.98)), grand multiparous (AOR=4.60, 95% CI (1.09, 19.27)),
planned pregnancy (AOR=14.48, 95% CI (4.18, 50.11), mode of delivery (SVD) (AOR=2.94,
viii
95% CI (1.24, 6.98)), previous facility delivery (AOR=2.36, 95% CI (1.01, 5.52)), number of
providers during delivery(≤2) (AOR=2.44, 95% CI (1.30, 4.57)), and institutional level RMC
index available (AOR=4.44, 95% CI (1.92, 10.24)) in the current study. Wheras, mothers’ age of
<25 years and longer duration at health facility were found to decrease the likelihood of reciving
respectful maternity by 82% (95% CI (.05, .67)) and 61% (95% CI (.17, .88)), respectively.
Conclusion: This study highlighted that compassionate and respectful maternity care was at its
low level, where less than 3 out of ten mothers who gave birth in the public health facilities in
the study area received such care. Therefore, this low level of care in this community can be
considered as an early warning and calls for strengthening the health systems to improve the
quality of maternal health care, with a strong focus on compastinate and respectful care as an
essential component of quality care.