Abstract:
Hydrological modeling for runoff simulations requires accurate rainfall data as a model input,
but in many developing countries like Ethiopia the rainfall observation network is relatively sparse.
In recent years, several techniques have been developed for estimating rainfall using satellite data.
The Climate Prediction Center Morphing Method (CMORPH) and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring
Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) near-real-time product
(TRMM3B42RT) are among the satellite rainfall products emerged in recent periods. Hence, the
main focus of this study was to compare the performance of Soil and Water Assessment Tool
(SWAT) hydrologic model using rainfall data input from satellite estimates (CMORPH and
TRMM3B42RT) and in situ measurements for stream flow simulations over Gumara catchment
located in Ethiopia. The study period 2003-2014 was used for downloading and extracting the
selected satellite rainfall estimates with daily-temporal and 0.25
0
x 0.25
0
spatial resolution. The
satellite rainfall estimates were downloaded freely from their sources as a NetCDF file format and
extracted for the specific study area using MATLAB R2013a and Panoply NetCDF, HDF and
GRIB data viewer version 4.5.1. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, calibration and validation of
the model was done using SWAT-CUP particularly the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2)
algorism for all rainfall inputs independently. The calibration period was from 2004-2010 leaving
one year as a “warm up” period and the validation period was from 2011-2014 for satellite rainfall
based simulations as well as in situ based simulations. Based on modeling results SWAT model
had showed poor performance and model uncertainties were relatively large when calibrated with
CMORPH satellite rainfall estimates compared to TRMM3B42RT satellite rainfall estimates in the
study area. Although, satellite rainfall based simulations specifically TRMM3B42RT based
simulations capture the shape of observed stream flow hydrograph, there was underestimation of
the stream flow volume simulated by satellite rainfall products followed by the reduction of model
performance statistics. Bias corrected satellite rainfall based simulations had significantly
improved the model performance as well as the volume of stream flow simulated, but overall
SWAT model yields good results for in situ rainfall based simulations than satellite rainfall based
simulations. In future applying other bias correction schemes and extracting satellite rainfall
estimates at finer temporal and spatial resolutions may improve the model performance even better.